House GOP's 1st Biden impeachment hearing was 'an unmitigated disaster'
House Republicans kicked off their effort to impeach President Biden, and there is general agreement it did not go well
The House Oversight Committee held its first hearing Thursday in an impeachment inquiry House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) recently launched against President Biden. Committee chair Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) said House Republicans have "a mountain of evidence revealing how Joe Biden abused his public office for his family’s financial gain." But "multiple witnesses called by the majority undercut the GOP's core message against Biden," Politico noted, and none presented any evidence to back up the GOP's claims.
"I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment," said conservative law professor Jonathan Turley of George Washington University, one of three GOP witnesses.
Even as the hearing was underway, The New York Times reported, some Republicans "privately fretted" that Comer "did not appear in control of the proceedings and had undercut his own narrative by calling witnesses who did not fully support it." One senior GOP aide told CNN the hearing was "an unmitigated disaster," adding: "Picking witnesses that refute House Republicans arguments for impeachment is mind blowing."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"If the Republicans had a smoking gun or even a dripping water pistol, they would be presenting it today," Rep. Jamie Rankin (D-Md.), the top Democrat on the committee, said at the hearing. Instead, "the majority sits completely empty handed with no evidence of any presidential wrongdoing, no smoking gun, no gun, no smoke."
Legal and constitutional experts said this is the first impeachment inquiry based on speculation rather than actual evidence of high crimes or misdemeanors. The lone Democratic witness, University of North Carolina law professor Michael Gerhardt, said "a fishing expedition is not a legitimate purpose" to launch an impeachment inquiry.
McCarthy "appears to have calculated that moving to impeach Biden will appease a powerful group of far-right House Republicans who could rather easily remove him as speaker," The Washington Post reported.
If so, it backfired, Rankin told CNN after the hearing. "I know there was a lot of consternation and alarm on the Republican side to see how weak the case was," he said. "Several Republicans were saying to me that the right wing is now saying that Kevin McCarthy actually set it up to be a failure because he didn’t want to proceed with impeachment. They couldn't believe that such a disaster would just happen by accident."
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.
Sign up to our 10 Things You Need to Know Today newsletter
A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
'Why had so many Covid inquiry witnesses called Matt Hancock a liar?'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
The daily business briefing: December 1, 2023
Business Briefing Tesla starts Cybertruck deliveries, the Dow surges to end November at a 2023 high, and more
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Three-quarters of mosques in China have been altered or destroyed
Under the radar Chinese authorities step up Xi Jinping's "sinicization" policy by removing Islamic architecture
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Should the US put conditions on Israel aid?
Today's Big Question Democrats are divided on the issue
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Why Hunter Biden offered to testify in House probe, and why Republicans said no
Speed Read Biden said he would testify in the House GOP's impeachment inquiry, but not behind closed doors
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Is Trump's renewed attack on the Affordable Care Act a blessing in disguise for Democrats?
Today's Big Question By setting his sights on "Obamacare" this weekend, the Republican presidential front-runner may have accidentally given Biden an early holiday present
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
'Germs can, in fact, be good'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
A nation moving apart
The Explainer Americans are increasingly sorting themselves into communities with shared politics. Is this bad for democracy?
By The Week US Published
-
'American democracy now seems perilously close to the point of no return'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Section 702: The fight over the government's spy powers
Under the Radar Critics say the law has been abused. Officials say it thwarts terror attacks. The clock is ticking.
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published